EIC Advanced Innovation Challenges 2026: Complete Guide to Europe's ARPA-Style Innovation Programme

Table of Contents

1. Introduction to EIC Advanced Innovation Challenges
2. Overview and Strategic Objectives
3. ARPA-Style Innovation Mechanisms
4. Purpose and Target Audience
5. Eligibility Criteria and Who Can Apply
6. Funding Structure and Support Available
7. Stage 1: Solution Design
8. Stage 2: Prototyping and User Testing
9. Application Process and Timeline
10. Evaluation Criteria and Selection Process
11. Portfolio Approach and Selection
12. Demand-Side Integration
13. Consortium Options and Flexibility
14. Programme Managers and Portfolio Management
15. Business Acceleration Services
16. Stage 1 Workshop and Collaboration
17. Key Dates and Deadlines 2026
18. Success Factors and Best Practices
19. Conclusion and Next Steps

1. Introduction to EIC Advanced Innovation Challenges

The European Innovation Council is introducing a new experimental funding instrument under the 2026 Work Programme: EIC Advanced Innovation Challenges, piloting ARPA-style mechanisms to drive breakthrough innovation through structured, staged-based support and closer integration of user and demand perspectives.

These Challenges aim to support high-risk, deep tech innovation with transformative potential, especially in areas where there is extensive research but lack of commercial uptake. The programme represents a significant evolution in European innovation funding, adopting proven ARPA-style methodologies that have been successful in driving breakthrough technologies in other contexts.

The EIC Advanced Innovation Challenges are shaped and steered by EIC Programme Managers, in collaboration with users and ecosystem actors, to ensure strong alignment between cutting-edge science, demand, and policy priorities. This collaborative approach ensures that funded projects address real-world challenges while maintaining scientific excellence and innovation potential.

As a pilot programme under the 2026 Work Programme, the EIC Advanced Innovation Challenges represent the European Commission's commitment to exploring new funding mechanisms that can accelerate the translation of research into market-ready solutions. The programme is designed to bridge the gap between fundamental research and commercial application, addressing the well-documented "valley of death" in innovation funding.

The experimental nature of this programme allows for flexibility and adaptation based on lessons learned, with the potential for scaling successful approaches in future work programmes. This represents a significant investment in Europe's innovation ecosystem, with a total budget of EUR 4 million for Stage 1 projects in 2026 and EUR 25 million for Stage 2 projects in 2027.

2. Overview and Strategic Objectives

The EIC Advanced Innovation Challenges programme is built around several key strategic features that distinguish it from traditional funding instruments and align with ARPA-style innovation mechanisms:

Stage-Gated Funding Model

The programme operates on a two-stage model with initial feasibility studies (Stage 1) followed by significant follow-up investments for scale-up (Stage 2):

• Stage 1: Up to €300,000 lump sum for up to nine months to prepare and benchmark breakthrough solutions and explore their viability. This stage focuses on solution design and feasibility assessment.
• Stage 2: Up to €2.5 million lump sum for up to 2.5 years to prototype solutions and test them in real world environments and with the involvement of users for the most promising projects. This stage focuses on prototyping and user testing.

Demand-Side Integration

Commercial users (e.g. industry, public sector) and/or end-users should be involved from the outset to validate use cases, enhance market relevance, and facilitate uptake. This integration ensures that innovations address real market needs and have clear pathways to commercialisation.

Flexible Consortium Structure

The programme is open to mono-beneficiaries or small consortia (2–3 partners), with flexibility to evolve between stages. This allows for optimal team composition based on project requirements and enables adaptation as projects progress.

Proactive Portfolio Management

Each challenge is guided by a Programme Manager who ensures strategic coherence and adaptation across funded projects. This management approach ensures that the portfolio of funded projects collectively addresses the challenge objectives while maintaining individual project excellence.

Strategic Objectives

The programme aims to:

• Accelerate the development of breakthrough technologies with high market potential
• Bridge the gap between research and commercial application
• Foster collaboration between researchers, innovators, and end-users
• Create a portfolio of diverse solutions addressing specific challenges
• Establish new models for innovation funding that can be scaled across Europe

3. ARPA-Style Innovation Mechanisms

The EIC Advanced Innovation Challenges programme adopts ARPA-style mechanisms that have proven successful in driving breakthrough innovation in other contexts. These mechanisms are designed to accelerate the development of high-risk, high-reward technologies through structured, goal-oriented approaches.

Programme Manager-Driven Approach

Each challenge is guided by dedicated EIC Programme Managers who play a central role in shaping and steering the innovation process. These managers work in collaboration with users and ecosystem actors to ensure strong alignment between cutting-edge science, demand, and policy priorities. This approach mirrors the successful DARPA model where programme managers have significant autonomy and responsibility for driving innovation in specific domains.

Staged-Gated Funding Process

The two-stage funding model implements a rigorous gating process that ensures only the most promising projects receive significant funding. This approach:

• Reduces risk by testing concepts before major investment
• Allows for course correction based on early results
• Ensures efficient allocation of resources to the most viable projects
• Creates clear milestones and decision points for project progression

Portfolio-Based Selection

The programme uses a portfolio approach to selection, aiming to fund a diverse and strategically coherent set of projects that best address the objectives of the Challenge. This approach:

• Ensures multiple solution approaches are explored simultaneously
• Balances risk across different technological approaches
• Creates synergies between complementary projects
• Maximises the probability of breakthrough success

User-Driven Innovation

The integration of commercial users and end-users from the outset ensures that innovations address real market needs. This user-driven approach:

• Validates use cases early in the development process
• Enhances market relevance and commercial potential
• Facilitates uptake and adoption of developed solutions
• Reduces the risk of developing solutions without market demand

Flexible Team Structures

The programme allows for flexible consortium structures that can evolve between stages, enabling optimal team composition based on project requirements and enabling adaptation as projects progress. This flexibility:

• Allows for the inclusion of new partners as needs emerge
• Enables restructuring based on early results
• Facilitates the formation of optimal teams for each stage
• Supports the dynamic nature of innovation development

4. Purpose and Target Audience

The EIC Advanced Innovation Challenges programme is specifically designed to address the critical gap in innovation funding where promising research and technologies struggle to transition from laboratory validation to commercial application. The programme targets high-risk, deep tech innovation with transformative potential, particularly in areas where there is extensive research but lack of commercial uptake.

Primary Purpose

The programme serves several key purposes:

• Bridging the Innovation Gap: Addresses the "valley of death" between research and commercialisation by providing structured support for high-risk innovations
• Accelerating Breakthrough Technologies: Provides the necessary funding and support to accelerate the development of transformative technologies
• Market Validation: Ensures innovations address real market needs through early user integration
• Risk Mitigation: Reduces the risk associated with developing breakthrough technologies through staged funding and expert guidance
• Ecosystem Development: Fosters collaboration between researchers, innovators, and end-users to create sustainable innovation ecosystems

Target Innovation Areas

The programme specifically targets innovations that:

• Build on scientific discoveries or technological breakthroughs
• Have the potential for disruptive impact in specific use cases
• Address areas with extensive research but limited commercial uptake
• Require significant funding over extended timeframes before returns can be generated
• Have the potential to create new markets or disrupt existing ones

Target Audience

The programme is designed for:

• Start-ups and SMEs: Companies with innovative technologies that need support to scale up
• Research Performing Organisations: Universities, research organisations, and technology organisations with breakthrough innovations
• Individual Inventors and Principal Investigators: Researchers and innovators working on transformative technologies
• Technology Teams: Groups within larger organisations focused on breakthrough innovation
• Consortia: Small partnerships (2-3 entities) combining complementary expertise

Expected Outcomes

The programme aims to deliver:

• Validated breakthrough technologies ready for market deployment
• Enhanced collaboration between research and commercial sectors
• New models for innovation funding and support
• Strengthened European innovation ecosystem
• Increased commercial uptake of research-based innovations

5. Eligibility Criteria and Who Can Apply

The EIC Advanced Innovation Challenges programme has specific eligibility criteria designed to ensure that the most promising innovators and organisations can access the funding and support they need. The programme offers flexibility in terms of application structure while maintaining high standards for eligibility.

Eligible Application Structures

Applicants can apply for EIC Advanced Innovation Challenge either as:

Single Legal Entity (Mono-Beneficiary)

You can apply as a single legal entity established in a Member State or an Associated Country if you are:

• A start-up with innovative technologies and growth potential
• A small and medium-sized enterprise (SME) with breakthrough innovations
• A research performing organisation, including:
  • Universities and higher education institutions
  • Research organisations
  • Technology organisations
  • Research teams
  • Individual Principal Investigators
  • Inventors

Important Note: Larger companies (i.e. which do not qualify as SMEs) are not eligible to apply as a single legal entity. This restriction ensures that the programme primarily supports smaller, more agile organisations that typically face greater challenges in accessing innovation funding.

Small Consortium (Multi-Beneficiary)

You can apply as a small consortium of maximum three eligible independent legal entities ('multibeneficiary') which must include at least one legal entity established in a Member State or Associated Country. This structure allows for:

• Combining complementary expertise from different organisations
• Sharing risks and resources across partners
• Leveraging diverse perspectives and capabilities
• Creating synergies between research and commercial partners

Geographic Eligibility

All applicants must be established in:

• EU Member States: All 27 European Union member countries
• Associated Countries: Countries that have association agreements with Horizon Europe, including:
  • Norway, Iceland, Liechtenstein (EEA countries)
  • Switzerland
  • Israel
  • Turkey
  • Ukraine
  • Moldova
  • Georgia
  • Armenia
  • Tunisia
  • Serbia
  • Montenegro
  • North Macedonia
  • Albania
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Kosovo
  • Faroe Islands

Organisational Requirements

Eligible organisations must:

• Be legally established and operational
• Have the necessary financial and operational capacity to implement the proposed project
• Possess the required technical expertise and resources
• Be able to demonstrate their ability to deliver the proposed innovation
• Meet all standard admissibility and eligibility conditions detailed in the programme documentation

Flexibility Between Stages

The programme allows for flexibility in consortium structure between Stage 1 and Stage 2:

• Consortia can evolve and adapt based on project needs
• New partners can be added if required for Stage 2 implementation
• Partnerships can be restructured based on lessons learned from Stage 1
• This flexibility ensures optimal team composition for each stage of the project

6. Funding Structure and Support Available

The EIC Advanced Innovation Challenges programme provides comprehensive funding and support through a structured two-stage approach, with significant financial resources allocated to support breakthrough innovation development. The total indicative budget demonstrates the European Commission's commitment to this new funding instrument.

Overall Budget Allocation

The programme has substantial financial backing with:

• Stage 1 Budget: EUR 4 million under the 2026 Work Programme for solution design projects
• Stage 2 Budget: EUR 25 million under the 2027 EIC Work Programme for prototyping and user testing projects
• Total Programme Budget: EUR 29 million across both stages

Stage 1: Solution Design Funding

If successful in Stage 1, you will receive a lump sum grant for a Research and Innovation Action to cover the eligible costs necessary for the implementation of your project. The Stage 1 funding parameters are:

• Maximum EU Contribution: Up to EUR 300,000 per project
• Project Duration: Maximum 9 months
• Funding Rate: 100% of eligible costs
• Funding Type: Lump sum contribution

During a Stage 1 project, you are expected to develop the full details of your solution which will be used as the basis of your Stage 2 application. You will also be expected to participate in a Workshop organised by the Agency, bringing together the different Stage 1 projects with external experts and potential users.

Stage 2: Prototyping and User Testing Funding

If successful in Stage 2, you will receive a lump sum grant for a Research and Innovation Action to cover the eligible costs necessary for the implementation of your project. The Stage 2 funding parameters are:

• Maximum EU Contribution: Up to EUR 2.5 million per project
• Project Duration: Maximum 2.5 years
• Funding Rate: 100% of eligible costs
• Funding Type: Lump sum contribution

Lump Sum Funding Mechanism

The funding rate of this grant will be 100% of the eligible costs. Eligible costs will take the form of a lump sum. Applicants must therefore propose the amount of the lump sum based on their estimated project costs as defined in the Decision of 7 July 2021 authorising the use of lump sum contributions under the Horizon Europe Programme – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2021-2027) – and in actions under the Research and Training Programme of the European Atomic Energy Community (2021-2025).

The lump sum approach provides several advantages:

• Simplified financial management and reporting
• Reduced administrative burden for beneficiaries
• Clear and predictable funding amounts
• Faster project implementation

Business Acceleration Services (BAS)

In addition to funding, Stage 2 projects will receive tailor-made access to a wide range of Business Acceleration Services (BAS). These services are designed to support the commercialisation and scaling of innovations and may include:

• Business development and market access support
• Investment readiness and investor matching
• Intellectual property and legal advice
• Technology transfer and commercialisation support
• Networking and partnership opportunities
• Mentoring and coaching services
• Access to innovation ecosystems and clusters

Grant Agreement and Legal Framework

The Model Grant Agreement can be found on the Funding & Tenders Portal. This agreement outlines the terms and conditions for receiving and managing the funding, including:

• Project implementation requirements
• Reporting and monitoring obligations
• Intellectual property rights and exploitation
• Financial management and audit requirements
• Communication and dissemination activities

Funding Progression and Continuity

The two-stage funding model ensures that:

• Only the most promising Stage 1 projects receive significant Stage 2 funding
• Projects can build upon their Stage 1 results and lessons learned
• Funding is allocated efficiently based on demonstrated potential
• There is a clear pathway from concept to market-ready solution

7. Stage 1: Solution Design

Stage 1 of the EIC Advanced Innovation Challenges programme focuses on solution design and feasibility assessment. This initial stage provides funding and support to develop and benchmark breakthrough solutions while exploring their viability in real-world contexts.

Stage 1 Objectives and Scope

The primary objectives of Stage 1 are to:

• Develop comprehensive solution designs for breakthrough innovations
• Assess the technical and commercial viability of proposed solutions
• Benchmark solutions against existing state-of-the-art approaches
• Validate use cases and market potential
• Prepare detailed project plans for Stage 2 implementation
• Establish partnerships and user engagement strategies

Funding and Duration

Stage 1 projects receive:

• Funding Amount: Up to €300,000 lump sum per project
• Project Duration: Maximum 9 months
• Funding Rate: 100% of eligible costs
• Funding Type: Lump sum contribution for Research and Innovation Action

Expected Deliverables and Activities

During Stage 1, beneficiaries are expected to:

• Solution Development: Develop the full details of the proposed solution, including technical specifications, implementation approach, and innovation roadmap
• Feasibility Assessment: Conduct comprehensive feasibility studies covering technical, commercial, and market aspects
• Benchmarking: Compare the proposed solution against existing state-of-the-art technologies and approaches
• User Engagement: Engage with potential users and stakeholders to validate use cases and requirements
• Risk Assessment: Identify and assess potential risks and develop mitigation strategies
• Stage 2 Preparation: Prepare detailed plans and documentation for Stage 2 application

Workshop Participation

Stage 1 beneficiaries are required to participate in a Workshop organised by the Agency. This workshop serves multiple purposes:

• Knowledge Sharing: Facilitate exchange of ideas and approaches between different Stage 1 projects
• Expert Input: Provide access to external experts who can offer guidance and feedback
• User Engagement: Connect projects with potential users and stakeholders
• Collaboration Opportunities: Identify potential partnerships and synergies between projects
• Stage 2 Preparation: Help projects prepare for the Stage 2 application process

Application Process for Stage 1

The Stage 1 application process involves:

• Open Call: An open call inviting applications from all eligible entities that meet the established admissibility and eligibility criteria
• Proposal Submission: Submission via the Funding & Tenders Portal before the specified deadline
• Proposal Format: Sections 1 to 3 and the cover page of part B must consist of a maximum of 10 format A4 pages
• Evaluation: Evaluation by a committee consisting of EIC expert evaluators and chaired by an EIC programme manager responsible for the Challenge
• Portfolio Approach: Use of a portfolio approach to select a variety of potential solutions

Evaluation Timeline

The evaluation process for Stage 1 follows this timeline:

• Evaluation Period: Indicatively within 5 weeks after the call deadline
• Result Notification: Applicants will be informed about the result of evaluation, including feedback on their proposal
• Grant Agreement: Successful applicants can expect their grant agreement to be signed within 2 months from the call deadline (indicative)
• Project Start: Projects are expected to start immediately after the signature of the Grant, not later than 1st October 2026

Success Criteria for Stage 1

Successful Stage 1 projects should demonstrate:

• Innovation Excellence: Clear breakthrough potential and novelty compared to state-of-the-art
• Technical Feasibility: Realistic and credible approach to solution development
• Market Potential: Clear use cases and market relevance
• Implementation Capability: Strong team with necessary expertise and resources
• User Engagement: Evidence of user involvement and demand validation

8. Stage 2: Prototyping and User Testing

Stage 2 of the EIC Advanced Innovation Challenges programme represents the major investment phase, focusing on prototyping solutions and testing them in real-world environments with the involvement of users. This stage builds upon the foundation established in Stage 1 and provides significant funding for the most promising projects.

Stage 2 Objectives and Scope

The primary objectives of Stage 2 are to:

• Develop functional prototypes of breakthrough solutions
• Test solutions in real-world environments and use cases
• Validate solutions with actual users and stakeholders
• Demonstrate commercial viability and market potential
• Prepare solutions for market deployment and scaling
• Establish partnerships and commercial relationships

Funding and Duration

Stage 2 projects receive substantial funding:

• Funding Amount: Up to €2.5 million lump sum per project
• Project Duration: Maximum 2.5 years
• Funding Rate: 100% of eligible costs
• Funding Type: Lump sum contribution for Research and Innovation Action
• Total Budget: EUR 25 million under the 2027 EIC Work Programme

Eligibility for Stage 2

Stage 2 is a restricted call open exclusively to:

• Stage 1 Beneficiaries: Only beneficiaries participating in Stage 1 are eligible to apply for Stage 2
• Successful Completion: Applicants must have successfully completed their Stage 1 project
• Demonstrated Potential: Projects must have shown sufficient promise and progress during Stage 1
• Updated Proposals: Stage 2 applications must build upon and refine the Stage 1 results

Expected Deliverables and Activities

During Stage 2, beneficiaries are expected to:

• Prototype Development: Build functional prototypes of the proposed solutions
• Real-World Testing: Test solutions in actual operational environments
• User Validation: Conduct extensive testing with real users and stakeholders
• Performance Assessment: Evaluate solution performance against defined metrics and benchmarks
• Market Validation: Demonstrate commercial viability and market acceptance
• Scalability Assessment: Evaluate the potential for scaling and commercial deployment
• Partnership Development: Establish commercial partnerships and user relationships

Business Acceleration Services (BAS)

Stage 2 projects receive comprehensive support through Business Acceleration Services:

• Tailor-Made Support: Customised services based on project needs and requirements
• Business Development: Support for market access and commercialisation strategies
• Investment Readiness: Preparation for follow-on funding and investment
• Intellectual Property: Guidance on IP protection and exploitation strategies
• Networking: Access to investors, partners, and potential customers
• Mentoring: Expert guidance and coaching throughout the project

Application Process for Stage 2

The Stage 2 application process involves:

• Restricted Call: Open exclusively to Stage 1 beneficiaries
• Submission Deadline: June 2027 at 17h00 Brussels local time
• Proposal Format: Further details about the Stage 2 format will be provided in the EIC Work Programme 2027
• Building on Stage 1: Applications must demonstrate how they build upon Stage 1 results
• Updated Plans: Proposals should reflect lessons learned and refined approaches

User Testing and Validation

A key component of Stage 2 is extensive user testing and validation:

• Real-World Deployment: Testing in actual operational environments
• User Feedback: Collecting and incorporating user feedback and requirements
• Performance Metrics: Establishing and measuring key performance indicators
• Iterative Improvement: Refining solutions based on testing results
• Market Validation: Demonstrating market acceptance and commercial potential

Success Criteria for Stage 2

Successful Stage 2 projects should achieve:

• Functional Prototypes: Working solutions that demonstrate the proposed innovation
• User Validation: Positive feedback and acceptance from target users
• Performance Validation: Demonstrated performance improvements over existing solutions
• Market Readiness: Clear pathway to commercial deployment
• Partnership Development: Established relationships with potential customers and partners
• Investment Interest: Demonstrated interest from investors or commercial partners

9. Application Process and Timeline

The EIC Advanced Innovation Challenges programme follows a structured application process with specific timelines and requirements for both stages. The process is designed to ensure efficient evaluation and selection while providing clear guidance to applicants.

Stage 1 Application Process

The Stage 1 application process follows these key steps:

Call Opening and Submission

• Call Opening: The call will open on November 15th, 2025
• Flexibility: The Director-General responsible for the call may decide to open the call up to one month prior to or after the envisaged date(s) of opening
• Submission Deadline: XX April 2026 at 17h00 Brussels local time
• Deadline Flexibility: The Director-General responsible may delay the deadline(s) by up to two months
• Submission Platform: All proposals must be submitted via the Funding & Tenders Portal

Proposal Format Requirements

The proposal format for Stage 1 is strictly defined:

• Page Limit: Sections 1 to 3 and the cover page of part B must consist of a maximum of 10 format A4 pages
• Content Structure: Proposals must follow the specified format and structure
• Documentation: All required documentation must be included with the submission

Evaluation Process

Stage 1 proposals undergo a comprehensive evaluation:

• Evaluation Committee: Proposals are evaluated by a committee consisting of EIC expert evaluators
• Committee Chair: The committee is chaired by an EIC programme manager responsible for the Challenge
• Portfolio Approach: A portfolio approach is used to select a variety of potential solutions
• Evaluation Timeline: Results are provided indicatively within 5 weeks after the call deadline

Stage 2 Application Process

The Stage 2 application process is more streamlined:

Eligibility and Timing

• Restricted Call: Stage 2 is a restricted call open exclusively to Stage 1 beneficiaries
• Submission Deadline: June 2027 at 17h00 Brussels local time
• Format Details: Further details about the Stage 2 format will be provided in the EIC Work Programme 2027

Building on Stage 1 Results

Stage 2 applications must:

• Demonstrate how they build upon Stage 1 results and lessons learned
• Show evidence of progress and achievement during Stage 1
• Present refined and updated project plans
• Include updated user engagement and validation strategies

Key Timeline Milestones

The overall programme timeline includes these critical milestones:

2025 Timeline

• November 15th, 2025: Stage 1 call opens (with potential flexibility of ±1 month)

2026 Timeline

• April 2026: Stage 1 submission deadline (XX April at 17h00 Brussels time)
• May-June 2026: Stage 1 evaluation period (5 weeks after deadline)
• June-July 2026: Grant agreement signing (within 2 months of deadline)
• October 1st, 2026: Latest project start date for Stage 1 projects
• October 2026 - June 2027: Stage 1 project implementation period

2027 Timeline

• June 2027: Stage 2 submission deadline
• 2027-2029: Stage 2 project implementation period (up to 2.5 years)

Administrative Requirements

Applicants must ensure compliance with all administrative requirements:

• Portal Registration: All applicants must be registered on the Funding & Tenders Portal
• Documentation: Complete and accurate submission of all required documents
• Deadline Compliance: Strict adherence to submission deadlines
• Format Compliance: Adherence to specified proposal formats and page limits
• Eligibility Verification: Confirmation of eligibility before submission

Communication and Feedback

The programme provides clear communication throughout the process:

• Result Notification: Applicants receive detailed feedback on their proposals
• Evaluation Feedback: Comprehensive feedback on proposal strengths and areas for improvement
• Timeline Updates: Regular updates on evaluation progress and timelines
• Support Services: Access to support services for technical and administrative questions

10. Evaluation Criteria and Selection Process

The EIC Advanced Innovation Challenges programme employs a rigorous evaluation process with clearly defined criteria and a portfolio-based selection approach. Each proposal is evaluated by multiple independent experts against specific award criteria with established thresholds and weightings.

Evaluation Process Overview

The evaluation process follows a structured approach:

• Independent Evaluation: Each proposal is evaluated by at least three independent expert evaluators
• Criteria-Based Assessment: Proposals are assessed against specific EIC award criteria
• Scoring System: Each criterion is scored on a scale from 0 to 5
• Threshold Requirements: Proposals must meet established thresholds to proceed
• Portfolio Selection: Final selection uses a portfolio-based approach

Evaluation Criteria and Weightings

The evaluation criteria are structured with specific thresholds and weightings:

Excellence (Threshold: 4/5, Weight: 60%)

The Excellence criterion carries the highest weight and focuses on the quality and novelty of the innovation:

Clarity and Relevance of the Innovation Idea

• Problem Definition: Is the problem clearly defined and well-understood?
• Solution Compelling: Is the proposed solution compelling and well-articulated?
• Problem-Solution Fit: How effectively does the innovation alleviate the identified problem?
• Use Case Clarity: Are the use cases clearly defined and realistic?

Breakthrough Nature and Novelty

• State-of-the-Art Comparison: Is the innovation novel compared to the current state of the art?
• Disruptive Potential: What is the potential for disruptive impact in the specific use case?
• Innovation Level: Does the innovation represent a significant advancement?
• Competitive Advantage: What competitive advantages does the innovation provide?

Performance Improvements

• Realistic Expectations: Are the expected performance improvements realistic and credible?
• Quantitative Metrics: Are there clear quantitative performance targets?
• Qualitative Benefits: Are the qualitative improvements well-defined?
• Evidence Base: Is there sufficient evidence to support the claimed improvements?

Impact (Threshold: 3.5/5, Weight: 20%)

The Impact criterion evaluates the potential for broader adoption and commercial success:

• Scale-Up Potential: Does the innovation show potential for wider adoption or scale-up?
• Market Attractiveness: What is the potential attractiveness to investors, industry, or public sector stakeholders?
• Commercial Viability: Is there a clear pathway to commercial success?
• Ecosystem Impact: What broader impact could the innovation have on the relevant ecosystem?

Quality and Efficiency of Implementation (Threshold: 3/5, Weight: 20%)

This criterion assesses the practical implementation aspects:

Work Plan and Timeline

• Realistic Planning: Is the work plan realistic within the budget and timeline?
• Risk Management: Are the main risks acknowledged with appropriate mitigation measures?
• Milestone Definition: Are clear milestones and deliverables defined?
• Resource Planning: Is the resource allocation appropriate and efficient?

Resource Allocation

• Person-Months: How appropriate and effective is the allocation of person-months?
• Cost Items: Are other cost items appropriately allocated and justified?
• Budget Efficiency: Is the budget allocation efficient and well-planned?
• Resource Optimization: Are resources optimized for maximum impact?

Consortium Capacity

• Expertise Level: To what extent do all consortium members have the necessary capacity and high-quality expertise?
• Team Composition: Is the team composition appropriate for the project requirements?
• Track Record: Do team members have relevant track records and experience?
• Complementary Skills: Do the partners have complementary skills and expertise?

Portfolio-Based Selection Process

Proposals that meet all thresholds are subject to a portfolio-based selection panel. The goal is to fund a diverse and strategically coherent set of projects that best address the objectives of the Challenge.

Portfolio Selection Criteria

The final funding decision is taken by the portfolio-based selection on the basis of:

• Individual Merit: The scoring of the proposal against the evaluation criteria
• Portfolio Balance: Considerations of portfolio balance across technologies, use cases, and application domains
• Strategic Coherence: How well the project fits within the overall portfolio strategy
• Diversity: Ensuring diversity of approaches and solutions

Portfolio Objectives

The portfolio approach aims to:

• Ensure multiple solution approaches are explored simultaneously
• Balance risk across different technological approaches
• Create synergies between complementary projects
• Maximise the probability of breakthrough success
• Address different aspects of the challenge comprehensively

Evaluation Timeline and Communication

The evaluation process follows a clear timeline:

• Evaluation Period: Indicatively within 5 weeks after the call deadline
• Result Notification: Applicants are informed about evaluation results and receive detailed feedback
• Feedback Quality: Comprehensive feedback on proposal strengths and areas for improvement
• Transparency: Clear communication about the evaluation process and outcomes

11. Portfolio Approach and Selection

The EIC Advanced Innovation Challenges programme employs a sophisticated portfolio-based selection approach that goes beyond individual project evaluation to ensure strategic coherence and maximise the probability of breakthrough success. This approach is central to the ARPA-style methodology and distinguishes the programme from traditional funding instruments.

Portfolio Selection Philosophy

The portfolio approach is based on the principle that breakthrough innovation requires multiple parallel approaches and that the collective impact of a strategically designed portfolio exceeds the sum of individual projects. This approach:

• Balances Risk: Spreads risk across different technological approaches and methodologies
• Ensures Diversity: Guarantees exploration of multiple solution pathways
• Creates Synergies: Enables complementary projects to reinforce each other
• Maximises Success Probability: Increases the likelihood of achieving breakthrough outcomes
• Addresses Complexity: Tackles complex challenges from multiple angles

Portfolio Selection Process

The portfolio selection process operates in two phases:

Phase 1: Individual Evaluation

All proposals first undergo individual evaluation against the established criteria:

• Expert Assessment: Each proposal is evaluated by at least three independent expert evaluators
• Criteria Scoring: Proposals are scored against Excellence, Impact, and Implementation criteria
• Threshold Filtering: Only proposals meeting all established thresholds proceed to portfolio consideration
• Quality Assurance: Ensures that all portfolio candidates meet minimum quality standards

Phase 2: Portfolio-Based Selection

Proposals that meet all thresholds are then subject to portfolio-based selection:

• Portfolio Panel: A dedicated panel evaluates proposals in the context of the overall portfolio
• Strategic Assessment: Evaluates how each project contributes to the portfolio strategy
• Balance Considerations: Ensures appropriate balance across different dimensions
• Final Selection: Makes final funding decisions based on portfolio optimization

Portfolio Balance Dimensions

The portfolio selection considers balance across multiple dimensions:

Technology Balance

The portfolio ensures diversity in technological approaches:

• Technology Maturity: Mix of early-stage and more mature technologies
• Technology Types: Different technological approaches and methodologies
• Innovation Levels: Incremental, radical, and disruptive innovations
• Risk Profiles: Balance of high-risk, high-reward and more conservative approaches

Use Case Diversity

The portfolio covers a broad range of use cases and applications:

• Application Domains: Different sectors and industries
• User Types: Various user communities and stakeholders
• Market Segments: Different market sizes and characteristics
• Geographic Coverage: Diverse geographic and regional considerations

Organisational Diversity

The portfolio includes different types of organisations and consortia:

• Organisation Types: Mix of start-ups, SMEs, research organisations, and universities
• Consortium Sizes: Single entities and small consortia
• Expertise Areas: Different technical and domain expertise
• Geographic Distribution: Representation from different countries and regions

Strategic Coherence

While ensuring diversity, the portfolio maintains strategic coherence:

• Challenge Alignment: All projects must contribute to addressing the specific challenge
• Synergy Potential: Projects should have potential for collaboration and knowledge sharing
• Complementary Approaches: Different projects should complement rather than compete
• Collective Impact: The portfolio should have greater impact than individual projects

Portfolio Management Benefits

The portfolio approach provides several key benefits:

Risk Management

• Diversification: Spreads risk across multiple approaches and technologies
• Failure Tolerance: Allows for some projects to fail while others succeed
• Learning Opportunities: Creates opportunities to learn from both successes and failures
• Adaptive Capacity: Enables adaptation based on early results

Innovation Acceleration

• Parallel Development: Enables multiple approaches to be developed simultaneously
• Cross-Fertilization: Allows ideas and approaches to cross-pollinate between projects
• Competitive Dynamics: Creates healthy competition between different approaches
• Rapid Iteration: Enables rapid iteration and improvement based on shared learning

Market Impact

• Comprehensive Coverage: Addresses different aspects of the challenge comprehensively
• Market Validation: Provides multiple validation points for different approaches
• Ecosystem Development: Contributes to the development of a broader innovation ecosystem
• Scalability Pathways: Creates multiple pathways for scaling and commercialisation

Portfolio Monitoring and Adaptation

The portfolio approach includes ongoing monitoring and adaptation:

• Progress Tracking: Continuous monitoring of portfolio performance and progress
• Adaptive Management: Ability to adapt the portfolio based on emerging results
• Knowledge Sharing: Facilitation of knowledge sharing between portfolio projects
• Strategic Adjustments: Making strategic adjustments to optimise portfolio performance

12. Demand-Side Integration

Demand-side integration is a fundamental pillar of the EIC Advanced Innovation Challenges programme, ensuring that innovations address real market needs and have clear pathways to commercialisation. This approach distinguishes the programme from traditional research funding by embedding user and market perspectives throughout the innovation process.

Core Principle of Demand-Side Integration

The programme requires that commercial users (e.g. industry, public sector) and/or end-users should be involved from the outset to validate use cases, enhance market relevance, and facilitate uptake. This integration ensures that innovations are developed with a clear understanding of market needs and user requirements.

Types of Demand-Side Stakeholders

The programme encourages involvement of various types of demand-side stakeholders:

Commercial Users

• Industry Partners: Companies that could potentially adopt or commercialise the innovation
• Technology Integrators: Organisations that could integrate the innovation into their products or services
• Market Leaders: Established companies in the target market segments
• Supply Chain Partners: Companies that could be part of the innovation's supply chain

Public Sector Users

• Government Agencies: Public sector organisations that could benefit from the innovation
• Public Services: Services that could be improved through the innovation
• Regulatory Bodies: Organisations that could influence the adoption of the innovation
• Public Procurement: Entities that could procure the innovation

End-Users

• Direct Users: Individuals or organisations that will directly use the innovation
• Beneficiaries: People or organisations that will benefit from the innovation
• User Communities: Groups of users with similar needs and requirements
• Stakeholder Groups: Broader groups affected by or interested in the innovation

Integration Throughout the Innovation Process

Demand-side integration occurs at multiple stages of the innovation process:

Stage 1: Solution Design

During the solution design phase, demand-side integration focuses on:

• Use Case Validation: Validating that the proposed use cases address real user needs
• Requirement Definition: Defining detailed requirements based on user input
• Market Assessment: Assessing market size, competition, and adoption potential
• User Engagement Planning: Planning how to engage users throughout the project
• Partnership Development: Developing partnerships with potential users and customers

Stage 2: Prototyping and User Testing

During the prototyping and testing phase, demand-side integration involves:

• Real-World Testing: Testing prototypes in actual user environments
• User Feedback Collection: Collecting and incorporating user feedback
• Performance Validation: Validating performance against user requirements
• Adoption Assessment: Assessing user willingness to adopt the innovation
• Commercial Partnership Development: Developing commercial partnerships with users

Benefits of Demand-Side Integration

The integration of demand-side perspectives provides numerous benefits:

Market Relevance

• Real Market Needs: Ensures innovations address actual market needs rather than perceived needs
• User-Centric Design: Results in solutions designed around user requirements and preferences
• Market Validation: Provides early validation of market potential
• Competitive Advantage: Creates competitive advantages through better user understanding

Commercial Success

• Faster Adoption: Accelerates market adoption through early user engagement
• Reduced Risk: Reduces the risk of developing solutions without market demand
• Clear Pathways: Creates clear pathways to commercialisation
• Investment Attraction: Makes innovations more attractive to investors

Innovation Quality

• Better Solutions: Results in better solutions through user input and feedback
• Iterative Improvement: Enables iterative improvement based on user testing
• Problem-Solution Fit: Ensures better fit between problems and solutions
• User Acceptance: Increases likelihood of user acceptance and adoption

Implementation Strategies

Successful demand-side integration requires specific implementation strategies:

Early Engagement

• From the Outset: Engaging users from the very beginning of the project
• Continuous Involvement: Maintaining user involvement throughout the project
• Regular Feedback: Establishing regular feedback mechanisms
• Partnership Development: Developing long-term partnerships with users

Diverse User Representation

• Multiple User Types: Engaging different types of users and stakeholders
• Geographic Diversity: Including users from different geographic regions
• Sector Representation: Representing different sectors and industries
• User Maturity Levels: Including both early adopters and mainstream users

Structured Engagement

• Formal Partnerships: Establishing formal partnerships with key users
• Advisory Roles: Giving users advisory roles in project governance
• Testing Agreements: Establishing agreements for user testing
• Feedback Mechanisms: Creating structured feedback collection and analysis

Challenges and Solutions

Demand-side integration presents certain challenges that need to be addressed:

User Availability

• Challenge: Ensuring sufficient user availability and commitment
• Solution: Developing incentives and clear value propositions for users
• Partnership Approach: Treating users as partners rather than subjects
• Flexible Engagement: Offering flexible engagement options

Conflicting Requirements

• Challenge: Managing conflicting requirements from different users
• Solution: Prioritising requirements based on market impact
• Consensus Building: Building consensus among different user groups
• Modular Design: Designing solutions that can accommodate different requirements

Intellectual Property

• Challenge: Managing intellectual property issues with user partners
• Solution: Establishing clear IP agreements from the beginning
• Confidentiality: Protecting confidential information appropriately
• Benefit Sharing: Developing fair benefit-sharing arrangements

13. Consortium Options and Flexibility

The EIC Advanced Innovation Challenges programme offers flexible consortium options that allow applicants to choose the most appropriate structure for their innovation project. This flexibility enables optimal team composition while maintaining the programme's focus on breakthrough innovation and user integration.

Available Consortium Structures

The programme supports two main consortium structures, each with specific eligibility requirements and advantages:

Single Legal Entity (Mono-Beneficiary)

Applicants can apply as a single legal entity established in a Member State or an Associated Country if they are:

• Start-ups: New companies with innovative technologies and growth potential
• Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs): Companies with breakthrough innovations that meet SME criteria
• Research Performing Organisations: Including:
  • Universities and higher education institutions
  • Research organisations and institutes
  • Technology organisations
  • Research teams within larger organisations
  • Individual Principal Investigators
  • Inventors and individual researchers

Important Restriction: Larger companies (i.e. which do not qualify as SMEs) are not eligible to apply as a single legal entity. This restriction ensures that the programme primarily supports smaller, more agile organisations that typically face greater challenges in accessing innovation funding.

Small Consortium (Multi-Beneficiary)

Applicants can apply as a small consortium of maximum three eligible independent legal entities ('multibeneficiary') which must include at least one legal entity established in a Member State or Associated Country. This structure provides:

• Complementary Expertise: Ability to combine different types of expertise and capabilities
• Risk Sharing: Distribution of project risks across multiple partners
• Resource Pooling: Combining resources and capabilities from different organisations
• Diverse Perspectives: Leveraging different viewpoints and approaches

Geographic Eligibility Requirements

All consortium members must be established in eligible countries:

EU Member States

All 27 European Union member countries are eligible, including:

• Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden

Associated Countries

Countries with association agreements with Horizon Europe, including:

• EEA Countries: Norway, Iceland, Liechtenstein
• Other European Countries: Switzerland, Turkey, Ukraine, Moldova, Georgia, Armenia
• Balkan Countries: Serbia, Montenegro, North Macedonia, Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo
• Other: Israel, Tunisia, Faroe Islands

Flexibility Between Stages

One of the key features of the programme is the flexibility to evolve consortium structures between Stage 1 and Stage 2:

Stage 1 to Stage 2 Evolution

• Consortium Evolution: Consortia can evolve and adapt based on project needs and lessons learned
• Partner Addition: New partners can be added if required for Stage 2 implementation
• Partnership Restructuring: Partnerships can be restructured based on Stage 1 results
• Optimal Team Composition: Ensures optimal team composition for each stage of the project

Adaptation Benefits

This flexibility provides several benefits:

• Learning Integration: Allows integration of lessons learned from Stage 1
• Resource Optimization: Enables optimization of resources based on project requirements
• Expertise Matching: Ensures the right expertise is available for each stage
• User Integration: Facilitates integration of new user partners identified during Stage 1

Consortium Formation Considerations

When forming consortia, applicants should consider several factors:

Complementary Expertise

• Technical Expertise: Partners should have complementary technical skills and knowledge
• Domain Knowledge: Different partners should bring different domain expertise
• Market Knowledge: Include partners with relevant market and user knowledge
• Implementation Capability: Ensure the consortium can implement the proposed solution

Organisational Compatibility

• Cultural Fit: Partners should have compatible organisational cultures
• Communication: Effective communication channels and processes
• Decision-Making: Clear decision-making processes and governance
• Resource Commitment: All partners should be committed to the project

Geographic and Sectoral Balance

• Geographic Distribution: Consider geographic distribution for broader impact
• Sectoral Diversity: Include partners from different sectors where relevant
• User Representation: Ensure adequate representation of user perspectives
• Market Coverage: Consider market coverage and access

Consortium Management

Effective consortium management is crucial for project success:

Governance Structure

• Clear Leadership: Establish clear leadership and coordination mechanisms
• Decision-Making Processes: Define clear decision-making processes
• Communication Protocols: Establish effective communication protocols
• Conflict Resolution: Develop conflict resolution mechanisms

Resource Allocation

• Fair Distribution: Ensure fair distribution of resources and responsibilities
• Capacity Assessment: Assess the capacity of each partner to deliver
• Risk Sharing: Establish clear risk-sharing arrangements
• Benefit Sharing: Define benefit-sharing arrangements

Quality Assurance

• Performance Monitoring: Monitor the performance of all consortium members
• Quality Standards: Establish and maintain quality standards
• Continuous Improvement: Implement continuous improvement processes
• Stakeholder Engagement: Ensure effective stakeholder engagement

Advantages of Different Structures

Each consortium structure offers specific advantages:

Single Entity Advantages

• Simplified Management: Easier project management and coordination
• Faster Decision-Making: Quicker decision-making processes
• Reduced Complexity: Lower administrative and coordination complexity
• Clear Accountability: Clear accountability and responsibility

Consortium Advantages

• Combined Expertise: Access to broader expertise and capabilities
• Risk Distribution: Distribution of project risks
• Resource Pooling: Combined resources and capabilities
• Network Effects: Benefits from partner networks and relationships

14. Programme Managers and Portfolio Management

Programme Managers play a central role in the EIC Advanced Innovation Challenges programme, embodying the ARPA-style approach to innovation management. Each challenge is guided by a dedicated Programme Manager who ensures strategic coherence and adaptation across funded projects, providing expert guidance and strategic direction throughout the innovation process.

Role and Responsibilities of Programme Managers

EIC Programme Managers serve as the driving force behind each challenge, with comprehensive responsibilities that span the entire innovation lifecycle:

Strategic Leadership

• Challenge Definition: Shaping and defining the specific innovation challenges
• Strategic Direction: Providing strategic direction and vision for the challenge
• Portfolio Strategy: Developing and implementing portfolio strategies
• Innovation Roadmap: Creating innovation roadmaps and pathways

Stakeholder Collaboration

• User Engagement: Collaborating with users and end-users to understand needs
• Ecosystem Coordination: Working with ecosystem actors and stakeholders
• Policy Alignment: Ensuring alignment with policy priorities and objectives
• Network Building: Building and maintaining networks of relevant stakeholders

Portfolio Management

• Project Selection: Leading the selection of projects for funding
• Portfolio Balance: Ensuring strategic coherence and balance across the portfolio
• Performance Monitoring: Monitoring portfolio performance and progress
• Adaptive Management: Making strategic adjustments based on emerging results

ARPA-Style Management Approach

The Programme Managers adopt the proven ARPA-style management approach that has been successful in driving breakthrough innovation:

Autonomous Decision-Making

• Expert Authority: Programme Managers have significant autonomy in their domains
• Strategic Freedom: Freedom to make strategic decisions and adjustments
• Responsive Management: Ability to respond quickly to emerging opportunities and challenges
• Innovation Focus: Focus on driving innovation rather than administrative compliance

Proactive Portfolio Management

• Strategic Coherence: Ensuring all projects contribute to the overall challenge objectives
• Adaptation: Adapting the portfolio based on emerging results and opportunities
• Synergy Creation: Creating synergies between different projects
• Risk Management: Managing portfolio-level risks and opportunities

Expert-Driven Approach

• Deep Expertise: Programme Managers bring deep expertise in their domains
• Technical Understanding: Strong technical understanding of the challenges and solutions
• Market Knowledge: Understanding of market dynamics and user needs
• Innovation Experience: Experience in driving breakthrough innovation

Portfolio Management Functions

Programme Managers perform several key portfolio management functions:

Portfolio Strategy Development

• Challenge Analysis: Analysing the challenge from multiple perspectives
• Solution Mapping: Mapping potential solution approaches and pathways
• Gap Identification: Identifying gaps in the solution landscape
• Strategy Formulation: Formulating comprehensive portfolio strategies

Project Selection and Evaluation

• Evaluation Leadership: Leading the evaluation of project proposals
• Portfolio Assessment: Assessing how projects fit into the overall portfolio
• Balance Considerations: Ensuring appropriate balance across different dimensions
• Strategic Alignment: Ensuring alignment with challenge objectives

Ongoing Portfolio Management

• Progress Monitoring: Continuously monitoring portfolio progress and performance
• Adaptive Management: Making strategic adjustments based on emerging results
• Knowledge Sharing: Facilitating knowledge sharing between projects
• Synergy Creation: Creating opportunities for collaboration and synergy

Collaboration with Stakeholders

Programme Managers work closely with various stakeholders to ensure programme success:

User and Demand-Side Collaboration

• User Needs Assessment: Working with users to understand their needs and requirements
• Use Case Development: Developing and validating use cases with users
• Market Validation: Validating market potential with commercial users
• Adoption Facilitation: Facilitating adoption and uptake of innovations

Ecosystem Coordination

• Stakeholder Mapping: Mapping and engaging with relevant ecosystem actors
• Partnership Development: Developing partnerships with key ecosystem players
• Network Building: Building networks of innovators, users, and stakeholders
• Ecosystem Development: Contributing to broader ecosystem development

Policy Alignment

• Policy Understanding: Understanding relevant policy priorities and objectives
• Alignment Ensuring: Ensuring alignment between innovation and policy goals
• Policy Input: Providing input to policy development where relevant
• Impact Maximisation: Maximising policy impact of innovation outcomes

Strategic Coherence and Adaptation

Programme Managers ensure strategic coherence while enabling adaptation:

Strategic Coherence

• Challenge Focus: Maintaining focus on the specific challenge objectives
• Portfolio Alignment: Ensuring all projects align with portfolio strategy
• Synergy Maximisation: Maximising synergies between different projects
• Impact Optimization: Optimising overall portfolio impact

Adaptive Management

• Emerging Opportunities: Identifying and responding to emerging opportunities
• Risk Mitigation: Adapting strategies to mitigate emerging risks
• Learning Integration: Integrating lessons learned into portfolio management
• Strategic Adjustments: Making strategic adjustments based on results

Knowledge Management and Sharing

Programme Managers facilitate knowledge management and sharing across the portfolio:

Knowledge Capture

• Best Practices: Capturing and documenting best practices
• Lessons Learned: Documenting lessons learned from successes and failures
• Innovation Insights: Capturing insights about innovation processes
• Market Intelligence: Gathering and sharing market intelligence

Knowledge Sharing

• Cross-Project Learning: Facilitating learning between different projects
• Expertise Transfer: Enabling transfer of expertise and knowledge
• Collaboration Facilitation: Facilitating collaboration between projects
• Ecosystem Knowledge: Sharing knowledge with the broader ecosystem

Performance Measurement and Impact Assessment

Programme Managers are responsible for measuring performance and assessing impact:

Performance Monitoring

• Progress Tracking: Tracking progress against objectives and milestones
• Performance Metrics: Developing and monitoring performance metrics
• Quality Assurance: Ensuring quality and excellence across the portfolio
• Risk Monitoring: Monitoring risks and taking corrective action

Impact Assessment

• Impact Measurement: Measuring the impact of innovations and the portfolio
• Success Stories: Documenting and sharing success stories
• Learning Documentation: Documenting learning for future programmes
• Policy Impact: Assessing impact on policy objectives

15. Business Acceleration Services

Business Acceleration Services (BAS) represent a comprehensive support system provided to Stage 2 projects in the EIC Advanced Innovation Challenges programme. These services are designed to accelerate the commercialisation and scaling of breakthrough innovations, providing tailor-made support that addresses the specific needs of each project.

Overview of Business Acceleration Services

In addition to funding, Stage 2 projects receive tailor-made access to a wide range of Business Acceleration Services. These services are specifically designed to support the later stages of technology development and scale-up, helping innovators overcome the challenges of bringing breakthrough technologies to market.

Comprehensive Service Portfolio

The Business Acceleration Services encompass a broad range of support activities:

Business Development and Market Access

• Market Strategy Development: Assistance in developing comprehensive market entry strategies
• Market Analysis: Detailed analysis of target markets, competition, and market dynamics
• Go-to-Market Planning: Support in developing go-to-market strategies and plans
• Customer Acquisition: Assistance in identifying and acquiring early customers
• Partnership Development: Support in developing strategic partnerships and alliances

Investment Readiness and Investor Matching

• Investment Preparation: Preparation for follow-on funding rounds and investment
• Investor Matching: Connection with relevant investors and investment networks
• Pitch Development: Development of compelling investment pitches and presentations
• Financial Modelling: Support in developing financial models and projections
• Due Diligence Support: Assistance in preparing for investor due diligence processes

Intellectual Property and Legal Support

• IP Strategy Development: Development of comprehensive intellectual property strategies
• Patent Support: Assistance with patent filing and protection strategies
• Legal Advisory: Legal advice on contracts, partnerships, and regulatory compliance
• IP Commercialisation: Support in commercialising intellectual property assets
• Regulatory Compliance: Guidance on regulatory requirements and compliance

Technology Transfer and Commercialisation

• Technology Assessment: Assessment of technology readiness and commercial potential
• Commercialisation Strategy: Development of technology commercialisation strategies
• Licensing Support: Support in developing licensing agreements and partnerships
• Technology Validation: Assistance in validating technology with potential customers
• Scale-up Planning: Support in planning technology scale-up and manufacturing

Networking and Partnership Opportunities

• Ecosystem Access: Access to innovation ecosystems and clusters
• Industry Networks: Connection with relevant industry networks and associations
• Peer Networking: Opportunities to network with other innovators and entrepreneurs
• International Expansion: Support for international market expansion
• Collaboration Opportunities: Facilitation of collaboration with other EIC projects

Mentoring and Coaching Services

• Executive Coaching: One-on-one coaching for founders and executives
• Technical Mentoring: Technical mentoring from domain experts
• Business Mentoring: Business mentoring from experienced entrepreneurs and executives
• Leadership Development: Support in developing leadership and management skills
• Team Building: Assistance in building and developing high-performing teams

Tailor-Made Service Approach

The Business Acceleration Services are designed to be tailor-made to address the specific needs of each project:

Individual Assessment

• Needs Assessment: Comprehensive assessment of each project's specific needs
• Gap Analysis: Identification of gaps in capabilities and resources
• Customised Support: Development of customised support packages
• Flexible Delivery: Flexible delivery of services based on project requirements

Stage-Appropriate Support

• Development Stage: Support appropriate to the technology development stage
• Market Readiness: Support based on market readiness and commercialisation stage
• Team Capabilities: Support that complements existing team capabilities
• Resource Availability: Support that considers available resources and constraints

Integration with EIC Ecosystem

The Business Acceleration Services are integrated with the broader EIC ecosystem:

EIC Network Integration

• EIC Community: Access to the broader EIC community of innovators
• Cross-Project Learning: Learning from other EIC-funded projects
• Best Practice Sharing: Sharing of best practices across the EIC portfolio
• Collaboration Opportunities: Opportunities for collaboration with other EIC projects

External Network Access

• Investor Networks: Access to EIC's network of investors and investment funds
• Industry Partners: Connection with industry partners and potential customers
• Research Networks: Access to research networks and academic institutions
• International Networks: Access to international innovation networks

Service Delivery and Quality Assurance

The delivery of Business Acceleration Services follows established quality standards:

Service Delivery

• Expert Providers: Services delivered by experienced professionals and experts
• Quality Standards: High-quality standards for all service delivery
• Continuous Improvement: Continuous improvement of service quality and effectiveness
• Feedback Mechanisms: Regular feedback collection and service improvement

Monitoring and Evaluation

• Service Monitoring: Regular monitoring of service delivery and effectiveness
• Impact Assessment: Assessment of the impact of services on project success
• Outcome Measurement: Measurement of outcomes and results from service delivery
• Success Tracking: Tracking of success stories and positive outcomes

Benefits for Stage 2 Projects

The Business Acceleration Services provide significant benefits for Stage 2 projects:

Accelerated Commercialisation

• Faster Market Entry: Accelerated entry into target markets
• Reduced Time to Market: Reduced time from prototype to market-ready product
• Improved Success Rate: Higher success rate in commercialisation efforts
• Risk Reduction: Reduced risk in commercialisation and scaling

Enhanced Capabilities

• Skill Development: Development of new skills and capabilities
• Knowledge Transfer: Transfer of knowledge and expertise
• Network Expansion: Expansion of professional and business networks
• Resource Access: Access to additional resources and capabilities

Competitive Advantage

• Market Positioning: Better market positioning and competitive advantage
• Investor Attraction: Increased attractiveness to investors
• Partnership Opportunities: Enhanced opportunities for strategic partnerships
• International Expansion: Support for international market expansion

16. Stage 1 Workshop and Collaboration

The Stage 1 Workshop represents a critical component of the EIC Advanced Innovation Challenges programme, providing a unique platform for collaboration, knowledge sharing, and strategic development. This workshop is organised by the Agency and brings together all Stage 1 projects with external experts and potential users, creating a dynamic environment for innovation and partnership development.

Workshop Purpose and Objectives

The Stage 1 Workshop serves multiple strategic purposes within the programme:

Knowledge Sharing and Learning

• Cross-Project Learning: Facilitating learning between different Stage 1 projects
• Best Practice Exchange: Sharing best practices and lessons learned
• Innovation Insights: Gaining insights into different innovation approaches
• Problem-Solving Collaboration: Collaborative problem-solving across projects

Expert Input and Guidance

• External Expertise: Access to external experts and thought leaders
• Technical Guidance: Technical guidance and advice from domain experts
• Business Advisory: Business and commercialisation advice
• Strategic Direction: Strategic direction and guidance for Stage 2 preparation

User Engagement and Validation

• User Feedback: Direct feedback from potential users and stakeholders
• Use Case Validation: Validation of use cases and market requirements
• Market Intelligence: Gathering market intelligence and insights
• Partnership Development: Development of partnerships with potential users

Workshop Structure and Format

The workshop is designed to maximise interaction and collaboration:

Participant Composition

• Stage 1 Beneficiaries: All Stage 1 project teams and representatives
• External Experts: Domain experts, technical specialists, and thought leaders
• Potential Users: Representatives from potential user communities and markets
• EIC Programme Managers: Programme managers responsible for the challenges
• Ecosystem Actors: Representatives from relevant innovation ecosystems

Workshop Activities

• Project Presentations: Presentations by each Stage 1 project team
• Expert Sessions: Sessions led by external experts on key topics
• Interactive Workshops: Interactive workshops and breakout sessions
• Networking Opportunities: Structured and informal networking sessions
• Collaboration Sessions: Sessions focused on identifying collaboration opportunities

Knowledge Exchange and Learning

The workshop facilitates comprehensive knowledge exchange:

Technical Knowledge Sharing

• Technology Approaches: Sharing of different technological approaches and methodologies
• Technical Challenges: Discussion of common technical challenges and solutions
• Innovation Methods: Sharing of innovation methods and processes
• Technical Expertise: Access to technical expertise and guidance

Business and Commercial Knowledge

• Market Insights: Sharing of market insights and intelligence
• Commercialisation Strategies: Discussion of commercialisation strategies and approaches
• Business Models: Exploration of different business models and approaches
• Investment Perspectives: Insights from investment and funding perspectives

User and Market Knowledge

• User Needs: Deep understanding of user needs and requirements
• Market Dynamics: Insights into market dynamics and trends
• Adoption Barriers: Understanding of adoption barriers and enablers
• Success Factors: Identification of key success factors for market adoption

Collaboration Opportunities

The workshop creates numerous opportunities for collaboration:

Inter-Project Collaboration

• Complementary Technologies: Identification of complementary technologies and approaches
• Joint Development: Opportunities for joint development and testing
• Resource Sharing: Possibilities for sharing resources and capabilities
• Synergy Creation: Creation of synergies between different projects

User Partnership Development

• User Engagement: Direct engagement with potential users and customers
• Partnership Formation: Formation of partnerships with user organisations
• Testing Agreements: Development of agreements for user testing and validation
• Commercial Partnerships: Development of commercial partnerships

Expert Collaboration

• Expert Advisory: Formation of expert advisory relationships
• Technical Collaboration: Technical collaboration with domain experts
• Mentoring Relationships: Development of mentoring relationships
• Research Collaboration: Opportunities for research collaboration

Stage 2 Preparation

The workshop plays a crucial role in preparing projects for Stage 2:

Strategic Planning

• Stage 2 Strategy: Development of strategies for Stage 2 implementation
• Resource Planning: Planning of resources and capabilities for Stage 2
• Risk Assessment: Assessment of risks and development of mitigation strategies
• Success Planning: Planning for success in Stage 2

Partnership Development

• Consortium Building: Building and strengthening consortium partnerships
• User Integration: Integration of user partners for Stage 2
• Expert Engagement: Engagement of experts for Stage 2 support
• Ecosystem Integration: Integration with broader innovation ecosystems

Capability Development

• Skill Development: Development of skills and capabilities needed for Stage 2
• Knowledge Acquisition: Acquisition of knowledge and expertise
• Network Building: Building of networks and relationships
• Resource Access: Access to additional resources and capabilities

Workshop Outcomes and Impact

The workshop delivers significant outcomes and impact:

Immediate Outcomes

• Enhanced Understanding: Enhanced understanding of challenges and opportunities
• Partnership Formation: Formation of new partnerships and collaborations
• Knowledge Acquisition: Acquisition of new knowledge and insights
• Network Expansion: Expansion of professional and business networks

Long-term Impact

• Improved Stage 2 Performance: Improved performance in Stage 2 projects
• Enhanced Collaboration: Enhanced collaboration across the portfolio
• Knowledge Ecosystem: Development of a knowledge ecosystem
• Innovation Acceleration: Acceleration of innovation and commercialisation

Workshop Organisation and Management

The workshop is carefully organised and managed by the Agency:

Organisational Structure

• Agency Leadership: Leadership and coordination by the Agency
• Expert Facilitation: Facilitation by experienced workshop facilitators
• Logistical Support: Comprehensive logistical and technical support
• Follow-up Activities: Follow-up activities and support

Quality Assurance

• Content Quality: High-quality content and expert input
• Participant Engagement: High levels of participant engagement
• Outcome Delivery: Delivery of meaningful outcomes and results
• Continuous Improvement: Continuous improvement of workshop effectiveness

17. Key Dates and Deadlines 2026

The EIC Advanced Innovation Challenges programme follows a carefully planned timeline with specific key dates and deadlines that applicants must adhere to. Understanding these timelines is crucial for successful application and project implementation.

Stage 1 Timeline and Deadlines

The Stage 1 application and implementation process follows a structured timeline:

Call Opening and Application Period

• Call Opening Date: November 15th, 2025
• Flexibility Period: The Director-General responsible for the call may decide to open the call up to one month prior to or after the envisaged date(s) of opening
• Application Period: Approximately 5 months from call opening to submission deadline
• Preparation Time: Sufficient time for proposal development and consortium formation

Submission Deadline

• Submission Deadline: XX April 2026 at 17h00 Brussels local time
• Deadline Flexibility: The Director-General responsible may delay the deadline(s) by up to two months
• Submission Platform: All proposals must be submitted via the Funding & Tenders Portal
• Late Submissions: Late submissions are not accepted under any circumstances

Evaluation and Selection Period

• Evaluation Period: Indicatively within 5 weeks after the call deadline
• Evaluation Process: Comprehensive evaluation by expert evaluators and portfolio selection
• Result Notification: Applicants will be informed about the result of evaluation, including feedback on their proposal
• Feedback Quality: Detailed feedback on proposal strengths and areas for improvement

Grant Agreement and Project Start

• Grant Agreement Signing: Successful applicants can expect their grant agreement to be signed within 2 months from the call deadline (indicative)
• Project Start Date: Projects are expected to start immediately after the signature of the Grant
• Latest Start Date: Not later than 1st October 2026
• Project Duration: Maximum 9 months for Stage 1 projects

Stage 2 Timeline and Deadlines

The Stage 2 application and implementation process follows a different timeline:

Stage 2 Application Period

• Application Type: Restricted call open exclusively to Stage 1 beneficiaries
• Submission Deadline: June 2027 at 17h00 Brussels local time
• Preparation Period: Approximately 6 months from Stage 1 completion to Stage 2 submission
• Format Details: Further details about the Stage 2 format will be provided in the EIC Work Programme 2027

Stage 2 Implementation

• Project Duration: Maximum 2.5 years for Stage 2 projects
• Implementation Period: 2027-2029 for Stage 2 project implementation
• Business Acceleration Services: Access to Business Acceleration Services throughout Stage 2
• User Testing and Validation: Extensive user testing and validation during Stage 2

Workshop Timeline

The Stage 1 Workshop is integrated into the project timeline:

Workshop Participation

• Mandatory Participation: Stage 1 beneficiaries are required to participate in the workshop
• Workshop Timing: Workshop organised during the Stage 1 project period
• Workshop Purpose: Bringing together different Stage 1 projects with external experts and potential users
• Stage 2 Preparation: Workshop helps prepare projects for Stage 2 application

Budget Allocation Timeline

The programme budget is allocated across different years:

Stage 1 Budget

• Budget Year: 2026 Work Programme
• Total Budget: EUR 4 million for Stage 1 projects
• Funding Period: 2026 for Stage 1 funding allocation
• Project Implementation: 2026-2027 for Stage 1 project implementation

Stage 2 Budget

• Budget Year: 2027 EIC Work Programme
• Total Budget: EUR 25 million for Stage 2 projects
• Funding Period: 2027 for Stage 2 funding allocation
• Project Implementation: 2027-2029 for Stage 2 project implementation

Administrative Deadlines and Requirements

Several administrative deadlines and requirements must be met:

Portal Registration

• Registration Requirement: All applicants must be registered on the Funding & Tenders Portal
• Registration Timing: Registration should be completed well before submission deadline
• Documentation Requirements: All required documentation must be uploaded and verified
• Account Verification: Account verification and validation processes

Proposal Format Requirements

• Page Limit: Sections 1 to 3 and the cover page of part B must consist of a maximum of 10 format A4 pages
• Format Compliance: Strict adherence to specified proposal formats
• Documentation Completeness: All required documentation must be included
• Quality Standards: Proposals must meet established quality standards

Flexibility and Contingency Planning

The programme includes flexibility provisions for timeline management:

Call Opening Flexibility

• Flexibility Period: Up to one month prior to or after the envisaged opening date
• Decision Authority: Director-General responsible for the call makes flexibility decisions
• Communication: Clear communication of any timeline changes
• Applicant Notification: Applicants notified of any changes to timeline

Deadline Flexibility

• Extension Authority: Director-General may delay deadlines by up to two months
• Extension Conditions: Extensions granted under specific conditions
• Applicant Communication: Clear communication of deadline extensions
• Impact Assessment: Assessment of impact on overall programme timeline

Critical Success Factors for Timeline Management

Successful timeline management requires attention to several factors:

Early Preparation

• Proposal Development: Early start on proposal development and refinement
• Consortium Formation: Early formation and stabilisation of consortium partnerships
• User Engagement: Early engagement with potential users and stakeholders
• Expert Consultation: Early consultation with experts and advisors

Quality Assurance

• Proposal Quality: Ensuring high quality of proposal content and presentation
• Compliance Checking: Thorough checking of compliance with all requirements
• Peer Review: Internal peer review and feedback processes
• Final Review: Final review before submission

Risk Management

• Timeline Buffer: Building buffer time into project timelines
• Contingency Planning: Developing contingency plans for potential delays
• Resource Planning: Ensuring adequate resources for timeline compliance
• Communication Planning: Planning for effective communication throughout the process

18. Success Factors and Best Practices

Success in the EIC Advanced Innovation Challenges programme requires a comprehensive understanding of the evaluation criteria, portfolio approach, and strategic positioning. This section outlines the key success factors and best practices that can significantly enhance the likelihood of securing funding and achieving project success.

Excellence Criterion Success Factors

The Excellence criterion carries the highest weight (60%) and requires careful attention to several key factors:

Clarity and Relevance of Innovation Idea

• Problem Definition: Clearly define and articulate the problem being addressed
• Solution Compelling: Present a compelling and well-articulated solution
• Problem-Solution Fit: Demonstrate clear alignment between problem and solution
• Use Case Clarity: Define clear, realistic, and well-validated use cases
• Market Need: Demonstrate clear market need and demand for the solution

Breakthrough Nature and Novelty

• State-of-the-Art Analysis: Conduct thorough analysis of current state-of-the-art
• Novelty Demonstration: Clearly demonstrate novelty compared to existing approaches
• Disruptive Potential: Show potential for disruptive impact in specific use cases
• Innovation Level: Demonstrate significant advancement over existing solutions
• Competitive Advantage: Articulate clear competitive advantages

Performance Improvements

• Realistic Expectations: Set realistic and credible performance improvement targets
• Quantitative Metrics: Define clear quantitative performance metrics
• Qualitative Benefits: Articulate qualitative benefits and improvements
• Evidence Base: Provide strong evidence to support claimed improvements
• Validation Approach: Outline approach for validating performance improvements

Impact Criterion Success Factors

The Impact criterion (20% weight) focuses on commercial potential and broader adoption:

Scale-Up Potential

• Market Size: Demonstrate significant market size and potential
• Scalability Strategy: Present clear strategy for scaling the solution
• Geographic Expansion: Show potential for geographic expansion
• Market Penetration: Demonstrate realistic market penetration potential
• Growth Trajectory: Outline clear growth trajectory and milestones

Market Attractiveness

• Investor Appeal: Demonstrate attractiveness to investors and funding sources
• Industry Interest: Show interest from relevant industry stakeholders
• Public Sector Potential: Demonstrate potential for public sector adoption
• Partnership Opportunities: Identify clear partnership opportunities
• Commercial Viability: Present clear pathway to commercial success

Implementation Criterion Success Factors

The Implementation criterion (20% weight) focuses on practical execution:

Work Plan and Timeline

• Realistic Planning: Develop realistic and achievable work plans
• Risk Management: Identify and address main risks with mitigation measures
• Milestone Definition: Define clear milestones and deliverables
• Resource Planning: Ensure appropriate and efficient resource allocation
• Timeline Feasibility: Demonstrate feasibility within budget and timeline constraints

Consortium Capacity

• Expertise Demonstration: Demonstrate necessary capacity and high-quality expertise
• Team Composition: Ensure appropriate team composition for project requirements
• Track Record: Show relevant track records and experience
• Complementary Skills: Ensure complementary skills and expertise across partners
• Resource Availability: Demonstrate availability of necessary resources

Portfolio Approach Considerations

Understanding the portfolio approach is crucial for success:

Portfolio Balance

• Technology Diversity: Ensure your approach adds diversity to the portfolio
• Use Case Coverage: Address different use cases and application domains
• Risk Profile: Consider how your project fits the overall risk profile
• Synergy Potential: Demonstrate potential for synergy with other projects
• Strategic Alignment: Ensure alignment with challenge objectives

Competitive Positioning

• Unique Value Proposition: Develop a unique value proposition
• Differentiation Strategy: Clearly differentiate from other approaches
• Competitive Advantage: Articulate clear competitive advantages
• Market Positioning: Position effectively in the target market
• Innovation Edge: Demonstrate clear innovation edge

Demand-Side Integration Best Practices

Effective demand-side integration is critical for success:

User Engagement

• Early Engagement: Engage users from the very beginning of the project
• User Validation: Validate use cases and requirements with real users
• Continuous Involvement: Maintain user involvement throughout the project
• Feedback Integration: Integrate user feedback into solution development
• Partnership Development: Develop strong partnerships with users

Market Validation

• Market Research: Conduct thorough market research and analysis
• Customer Interviews: Conduct extensive customer interviews
• Market Testing: Test market assumptions and hypotheses
• Competitive Analysis: Conduct comprehensive competitive analysis
• Market Size Assessment: Assess market size and potential accurately

Proposal Development Best Practices

Effective proposal development requires attention to several key areas:

Content Quality

• Clear Writing: Write clearly and concisely
• Logical Structure: Ensure logical structure and flow
• Evidence-Based: Support all claims with evidence
• Professional Presentation: Ensure professional presentation and formatting
• Comprehensive Coverage: Cover all required aspects comprehensively

Technical Excellence

• Technical Depth: Demonstrate appropriate technical depth
• Innovation Clarity: Clearly articulate the innovation
• Feasibility Demonstration: Demonstrate technical feasibility
• Risk Assessment: Conduct thorough risk assessment
• Mitigation Strategies: Develop comprehensive mitigation strategies

Consortium Development Best Practices

Effective consortium development is crucial for success:

Partner Selection

• Complementary Expertise: Select partners with complementary expertise
• Track Record: Ensure partners have relevant track records
• Commitment Level: Ensure high commitment levels from all partners
• Cultural Fit: Ensure good cultural fit between partners
• Geographic Balance: Consider geographic balance where relevant

Consortium Management

• Clear Governance: Establish clear governance structure
• Communication Protocols: Develop effective communication protocols
• Decision-Making Processes: Define clear decision-making processes
• Resource Allocation: Ensure fair and efficient resource allocation
• Risk Sharing: Establish clear risk-sharing arrangements

Stage 2 Preparation Best Practices

Successful Stage 2 preparation requires strategic planning:

Stage 1 Execution

• High-Quality Delivery: Deliver high-quality results in Stage 1
• Milestone Achievement: Achieve all Stage 1 milestones
• Learning Integration: Integrate lessons learned into Stage 2 planning
• User Engagement: Maintain strong user engagement throughout Stage 1
• Partnership Development: Develop partnerships during Stage 1

Stage 2 Planning

• Strategic Planning: Develop comprehensive Stage 2 strategy
• Resource Planning: Plan resources and capabilities for Stage 2
• Risk Assessment: Assess and plan for Stage 2 risks
• Success Planning: Plan for Stage 2 success and impact
• Commercialisation Strategy: Develop clear commercialisation strategy

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Understanding common pitfalls can help avoid costly mistakes:

Proposal Development Pitfalls

• Insufficient Detail: Providing insufficient technical or commercial detail
• Weak Evidence: Failing to provide strong evidence for claims
• Poor Structure: Poor proposal structure and organisation
• Missing Elements: Missing required elements or information
• Unrealistic Claims: Making unrealistic or unsupported claims

Strategic Pitfalls

• Weak User Engagement: Insufficient user engagement and validation
• Poor Market Understanding: Poor understanding of market dynamics
• Inadequate Risk Assessment: Inadequate assessment and mitigation of risks
• Weak Consortium: Weak or inappropriate consortium composition
• Lack of Innovation: Lack of clear innovation or novelty

19. Conclusion and Next Steps

The EIC Advanced Innovation Challenges programme represents a significant evolution in European innovation funding, introducing ARPA-style mechanisms to drive breakthrough innovation through structured, staged-based support and closer integration of user and demand perspectives. This experimental funding instrument under the 2026 Work Programme demonstrates the European Commission's commitment to exploring new approaches that can accelerate the translation of research into market-ready solutions.

Programme Significance and Innovation

The EIC Advanced Innovation Challenges programme is significant for several reasons:

Innovation in Funding Approach

• ARPA-Style Mechanisms: Introduction of proven ARPA-style mechanisms to European innovation funding
• Staged-Gated Funding: Implementation of staged-gated funding with clear progression criteria
• Portfolio Management: Portfolio-based approach to innovation funding and management
• User Integration: Systematic integration of user and demand perspectives
• Programme Manager Leadership: Programme manager-driven approach to innovation management

Addressing Innovation Gaps

• Valley of Death: Directly addressing the "valley of death" in innovation funding
• High-Risk Innovation: Supporting high-risk, deep tech innovation with transformative potential
• Commercial Uptake: Focusing on areas with extensive research but lack of commercial uptake
• Market Validation: Ensuring innovations address real market needs
• Breakthrough Potential: Supporting innovations with breakthrough and disruptive potential

Strategic Investment and Impact

The programme represents a substantial strategic investment in Europe's innovation ecosystem:

Financial Investment

• Total Budget: EUR 29 million total investment across both stages
• Stage 1 Investment: EUR 4 million for solution design and feasibility studies
• Stage 2 Investment: EUR 25 million for prototyping and user testing
• Individual Project Support: Up to EUR 300,000 for Stage 1 and EUR 2.5 million for Stage 2
• Business Acceleration Services: Comprehensive support services for Stage 2 projects

Expected Impact

• Breakthrough Technologies: Development of breakthrough technologies with market potential
• Innovation Ecosystem: Strengthening of Europe's innovation ecosystem
• Commercial Success: Increased commercial success of research-based innovations
• Market Creation: Creation of new markets and disruption of existing ones
• Economic Growth: Contribution to economic growth and competitiveness

Key Success Factors for Applicants

Success in the programme requires attention to several key factors:

Excellence and Innovation

• Clear Problem Definition: Clearly define the problem being addressed
• Compelling Solution: Present a compelling and well-articulated solution
• Breakthrough Potential: Demonstrate clear breakthrough and disruptive potential
• Novelty: Show clear novelty compared to state-of-the-art
• Performance Improvements: Present realistic and credible performance improvements

Market and Impact

• Market Potential: Demonstrate significant market potential and scale-up opportunities
• User Engagement: Ensure strong user engagement and demand validation
• Commercial Viability: Present clear pathway to commercial success
• Investor Appeal: Demonstrate attractiveness to investors and stakeholders
• Ecosystem Impact: Show potential for broader ecosystem impact

Implementation Excellence

• Realistic Planning: Develop realistic and achievable work plans
• Risk Management: Identify and address risks with appropriate mitigation measures
• Team Capability: Ensure strong team capabilities and expertise
• Resource Allocation: Demonstrate appropriate and efficient resource allocation
• Consortium Strength: Build strong and complementary consortium partnerships

Next Steps for Potential Applicants

Potential applicants should take several key steps to prepare for the programme:

Immediate Preparation Steps

• Portal Registration: Register on the Funding & Tenders Portal
• Team Formation: Form or strengthen your consortium team
• User Engagement: Begin engaging with potential users and stakeholders
• Market Research: Conduct thorough market research and analysis
• Expert Consultation: Consult with experts and advisors

Strategic Planning

• Innovation Strategy: Develop clear innovation strategy and roadmap
• Market Strategy: Develop comprehensive market entry strategy
• Risk Assessment: Conduct thorough risk assessment and mitigation planning
• Resource Planning: Plan resources and capabilities for both stages
• Partnership Development: Develop strategic partnerships and collaborations

Proposal Development

• Early Start: Start proposal development early to ensure quality
• Quality Focus: Focus on high-quality proposal content and presentation
• Evidence Gathering: Gather strong evidence to support all claims
• Peer Review: Conduct internal peer review and feedback processes
• Final Preparation: Ensure final preparation and submission readiness

Programme Evolution and Future

The programme is designed as a pilot with potential for evolution and scaling:

Learning and Adaptation

• Experimental Nature: Programme designed as experimental to test new approaches
• Learning Integration: Lessons learned will inform future programme design
• Adaptive Management: Programme includes adaptive management capabilities
• Continuous Improvement: Continuous improvement based on results and feedback
• Best Practice Development: Development of best practices for future programmes

Scaling Potential

• Success Scaling: Successful approaches can be scaled to other programmes
• Methodology Transfer: ARPA-style methodologies can be transferred to other contexts
• Ecosystem Development: Contribution to broader innovation ecosystem development
• Policy Impact: Potential impact on innovation policy and funding approaches
• International Influence: Potential influence on international innovation funding

Call to Action

The EIC Advanced Innovation Challenges programme represents a unique opportunity for innovators to access substantial funding and support for breakthrough innovation. The programme's ARPA-style approach, combined with significant financial backing and comprehensive support services, creates an exceptional environment for developing and commercialising transformative technologies.

Potential applicants are encouraged to:

• Assess Eligibility: Carefully assess eligibility and consortium options
• Engage Early: Begin user engagement and market validation early
• Develop Excellence: Focus on developing excellent proposals that meet all criteria
• Plan Strategically: Plan strategically for both Stage 1 and Stage 2
• Seek Support: Seek support and guidance from experts and advisors

The programme's call opens on November 15th, 2025, with submission deadline in April 2026. This provides sufficient time for thorough preparation and development of high-quality proposals. The European Commission's commitment to this experimental approach demonstrates the importance of finding new ways to accelerate innovation and bridge the gap between research and commercialisation.

Success in the EIC Advanced Innovation Challenges programme can provide not only substantial funding but also access to a unique ecosystem of support, expertise, and networks that can accelerate the path to commercial success. For innovators with breakthrough technologies and the ambition to create significant impact, this programme represents an exceptional opportunity to realise their vision and contribute to Europe's innovation leadership.